• Cryptoasset Report
  • August 4, 2020

Decred is a governance-focused cryptocurrency that uses a hybrid PoS/PoW model.


Jake Yocom-Piatt, Decred’s founder, developed a series of concerns about Bitcoin while working on btcsuite, including:

  • Ineffective and inefficient governance
  • Lack of funding for protocol development
  • The outsized influence of Proof of Work miners on development decisions

Jake Yocom-Piatt, who would later lead Decred project development through Company 0, discusses these issues at length in a late 2015 blog post. Indeed, the Bitcoin community has debated each of these areas considerably, with many viewing these factors as significant roadblocks to Bitcoin’s progress. Bitcoin has no formal governance structure, and decisions to alter the protocol are made entirely off-chain, typically by insiders/early adopters and heads of large mining operations. Changes to the Bitcoin protocol must be approved by consensus of the Bitcoin Core developers and adopted by miners, and there is no direct way for Bitcoin users or associated groups to vote on protocol changes. In particular, the Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) system provides a collaborative repository for proposing protocol upgrades, though no formal system for implementation.

Project Details

Decred utilizes neither solely the ‘1 CPU = 1 vote’ of Bitcoin/Proof of Work (PoW) nor the ‘1 token = 1 vote’ of a pure PoS protocol, opting instead for a hybrid approach. Transactions on the Decred network are validated through a hybrid PoW and PoS system. At a high level, PoW miners generate blocks that a randomly selected set of PoS validators must validate before the block is appended to the main blockchain. This architecture is part of Decred’s overall goal of giving various stakeholders input in managing the network. PoS validators act as an explicit check on PoW miners; the former can reject invalid blocks or those that use software versions not preferred by token holders. The block rewards are split between miners, stakers, the development pool, and airdrop benefactors. The 60% PoW miner reward is reduced proportionally if the block is not approved by all five randomly chosen PoS validators.

A graph illustrating how Decred's supply increases over time and how new tokens are distributed.

The PoW component of Decred uses the Blake-256 hashing algorithm. In early 2018, ASIC mining units for Blake-256 hashing algorithms were released, quickly increasing the total hashing power of the Decred network by a factor of 20. These ASICs can also be used in Sia. Similar to Bitcoin, hashing power in Decred is relatively concentrated to a small number of mining pools. Due to Decred’s hybrid architecture, where PoS stakers can reject fraudulent blocks, the introduction of ASICs and mining centralization are arguably not as crucial issues as in Bitcoin or other pure PoW networks. However, the development of ASICs will likely contribute to greater security for the network and generate miner interest in DCR.One of Decred’s defining characteristic is its focus on on-chain governance. In order to vote on changes to the project, including protocol changes such as those to the consensus layer, and ecosystem development among others, users must stake DCR in return for which they receive a voting ticket. Proposals and discussion of any governance decisions occur via the Politeia platform while votes are cast by participants signing transactions via the Decred wallet. Much of Decred’s development occurs through a contracting system whereby Decred users can approve contracts with the requisite funding coming from a 10% share of Decred block rewards. There is reasonable evidence for the efficacy of a decentralized funding and development system such as this. For instance, in 2019, the project made significant progress towards improved privacy and scalability, marked by the release of the CoinShuffle ++ mixing implementation in August and the launch of Decred on the second-layer Lightning Network in December.