2017 Token Sales in Review: Part II
Token sales and ICO activity in 2017 involved an incredible variety of projects. As a group, they show all the many ways entrepreneurs are applying blockchain technology and tokenization to sectors throughout the economy.
Part I of the 2017 Year End Review looked at the overall token sale market, and the phenomenal growth in both sales and amounts raised that defined 2017. In Part II, we look more closely at some of the key trends and explore the year through the lens of ICOs’ sectors and industries. Taking 2017’s completed token sales that raised more than $25,000 and grouping them by industry gives the chart below.
The above graph illustrates the degree to which the financial, media, and information industries garnered the bulk of ICO attention during 2017. (For an overview of how our industry and sector classifications were developed, read this article). This concentration shouldn’t be surprising: cryptoassets are new financial vehicles built on new methods to secure information. The concentration in media reflects a variety of trends: the demographic overlap between the gaming community and the blockchain community; the presence of gambling platforms, which date back to the industry’s origins; and the inspiration many in the industry take to disrupting incumbent social network behemoths like Facebook. The rest of the chart also shows how diverse token-based projects are becoming. This is laudable, because these projects are expanding the horizon of possibility for blockchains. It should also be treated with caution, because tokens still suffer from lingering usability challenges that make it difficult to onboard those new to cryptoassets.The below chart provides a different view on the distribution of ICOs, considering them on a relative basis, while adding percentages for funds raised across industries.
ICO Trends by Industry
Several relative surprises emerge: while the leading position of financially-themed ICOs is clear, we also see how, from the perspective of funds raised, financial ICOs finished in second position after the information industry, which includes many of the ‘blockbuster’ ICOs targeted at next-generation blockchain infrastructure, like Filecoin, Tezos, Polkadot, and Blockstack.Another way of thinking about the distribution of ICOs by industry throughout 2017 emerges from the chart below, where a temporal component of 2017’s ICO activity provides further perspective upon the year’s activities:
The above graph shows the predominance of the Information industry in terms of 2017’s blockbuster sales. It also reinforces how active the finance industry was, particularly in the second half of the year: 199 ICOs raising $2.3 billion, with an average raise of $11.3 million and a median of $5 million.This reflected a couple trends:
- As more people entered the industry or thought about entering the industry, entrepreneurs raced to provide them with products and services.
- As the entire crypto-asset industry itself grew almost 10-fold in Q3 and Q4, people needed tools to manage their own funds.
- As the entire community grew, it provided a ready market of people with crypto-assets and with some experience in basic financial concepts. It’s an ideal base of potential first users.
2017 Finance ICOs
The graph below disaggregates the Finance Industry into its composite sectors and shows the types of products these projects are launching.
One immediate observation is the role of the outsized raises in shaping both the larger amounts raised, as well as the broader statistics across the industry. For example, the 5 largest raises, clearly identifiable above, collectively raised $458 million, with an average raise of $91.7 million. Removing those five from the broader industry also leads to a strikingly different set of figures: the remaining 194 sales account for $1.8 billion in sales, with a new, lowered average of $9.2 million. That this second group’s median remains virtually the same at $4.8 million also illustrates the extent to which the largest sales represent outliers.
Considering the influence of the largest sales, as we have done here, illustrates why we have begun to think about the classification of ICOs by raise bands, a concept we discussed briefly during the latter part of 2017, but which we believe provides a number of useful insights when thinking about the larger token sale market. In our view, while the largest raises capture an outsized percentage of both funds raised and media attention, the bands between $5 and $60 million are in many ways where much of the the most exciting activity in the space is taking place. In Part III of our extended 2017 year-end review, we’ll take a closer look at the issue of ICO raise bands and why they can be a useful framework for exploring the evolving industry.